When I moved to Durham, North Carolina, in the mid-1980s, the county had two separate school systems. At its center, like a bulls-eye, was the city system, which was overwhelmingly African American and had the state's highest dropout rate and some of its lowest test scores. Its undersized tax base, including a hollowed-out downtown, made it hard to raise enough revenue to close the gap.
Encircling it was the county system, which was whiter and more suburban, and it included Research Triangle Park, home of taxpaying giants like IBM. By raising the property tax one cent, the county could reap $30 per student, whereas the city could only reap $17. Not surprisingly, the county spent twice as much per pupil on instructional materials, and had the test scores to show for it.
Shortly afterward, Durham's leaders formed a task force that laid the groundwork for the 1992 merger into a single school system. The panel's work was excruciating: Its 41 members had to grapple with issues like racial equity and power sharing, and the discussions laid bare the city's fault lines. But they also "served to undergird a broader acceptance of ethnic diversity within the community," says task-force member Deborah Giles, now the city's director of equal opportunity and equity assurance.
[For more on this story by BARRY YEOMAN, go to https://psmag.com/social-justi...-lead-to-segregation]
Comments (0)