Skip to main content

It's not surprising: CA home visitors, like other caregivers, have high ACE scores

 

Last week, at the California Home Visiting Summit, about 500 amazing front-line caregivers gathered to share their experiences and learn about the latest research and practice.

I was invited to give a presentation about "the unified science of ACEs", which includes the epidemiology of adverse childhood experiences (the original CDC-Kaiser Permanente ACE Study and all the other subsequent ACE surveys), the neurobiology of toxic stress, the long-term biomedical and epigenetic consequences of toxic stress, and resilience research, across the lifespan.

In other words, who's affected by ACEs, how toxic stress affects the brain and the body, how it's transmitted from generation to generation, and how we're preventing and healing the damage at all ages.    

I call it ACEs science. (If you're interested, my presentation is attached.)

As I often do during presentations, I offered those who wanted to do so, to participate in an anonymous survey that would show us instantly the ACE scores in the room (and to talk with anyone afterwards if they wanted to). We've posted the results from other meetings previously. (Sonoma County Blue Ribbon Training, International Attachment Conference

What wasn't surprising is that, for most questions, the percentage of people answering "yes" to the ACE questions was higher than the original ACE Study. 

But what was -- and should be -- of concern to California's home visiting program is how many people had an ACE score of 4 or more. It's at an ACE score of four or higher that you start to see very significant health effects. That's something that I hadn't asked in other presentations, because either that multiple choice wasn't available, or I didn't know about it. (I use PollEverywhere.com.)

The image at the top of this blog shows the results -- 63% -- for the afternoon session during which 23 people responded. For the morning session, where 56 people responded, the result was 51 percent -- more than four times the percentage in the original ACE Study, which was 12.5%. According to the latest California data (2011 and 2013), 16% of the state's residents have an ACE score of 4 or more.  

CAHomeWS

Of course, this is a relatively small sample, but the results are significant enough that it's probably useful to do an anonymous ACE survey of all home visitors -- combined with education about ACEs science and self-care. (A good toolkit for this is the NEAR@Home toolkit for home visitors. It's being used by other related professions, as well. And here's some research in which home visitors participated that looked at how self-care, specifically mindfulness, helped them be physically and mentally healthier, no matter what their ACE scores.) 

These results show that, as for any caring profession -- people who work in child welfare, domestic violence shelters, homeless shelters, substance abuse clinics, medical clinics, in education, and, yes, even in law enforcement and criminal justice -- it's likely that ACE scores are high for more people than we realize. And it's important for people to learn what their ACE scores are so that they understand how important self-care is, not only for themselves, but for those they serve. 

Below are the results from the conference morning and afternoon sessions for the 10 questions of the original ACE Study:

1. Did a parent or other adult in the household often or very often… Swear at you, insult you, put you down, or humiliate you?

ACE Study -- 10.6% "Yes" 
CA home visitors (morning session - 56 people) -- 46%
CA home visitors (afternoon session - 23 people) -- 45%

2. Did an adult or person at least 5 years older than you ever… Touch or fondle you or have you touch their body in a sexual way?

ACE Study -- 20.7%  "Yes"
CA home visitors (morning session - 56 people) -- 59%  "Yes"
CA home visitors (afternoon session - 23 people) -- 43%  "Yes"

3. Did you often or very often feel that … No one in your family loved you or thought you were important or special?

ACE Study -- 14.8% "Yes"
CA home visitors (morning session - 56 people) -- 36%  "Yes"
CA home visitors (afternoon session - 23 people) -- 26%  "Yes"

4. Did you often or very often feel that … You didn't have enough to eat, had to wear dirty clothes, and had no one to protect you?

ACE Study -- 9.9% "Yes"
CA home visitors (morning session - 56 people) -- 15%  "Yes"
CA home visitors (afternoon session - 23 people) -- 13%  "Yes"

5. Was a biological parent ever lost to you through divorce, abandonment, or other reason?

ACE Study -- 23.3% "Yes"
CA home visitors (morning session - 56 people) -- 53%  "Yes"
CA home visitors (afternoon session - 23 people) -- 36%  "Yes"

6. Was your mother or stepmother: Often or very often pushed, grabbed, slapped, or had something thrown at her? or Sometimes, often, or very often kicked, bitten, hit with a fist, or hit with something hard? or Ever repeatedly hit over at least a few minutes or threatened with a gun or knife?

ACE Study -- 12.7% "Yes"
CA home visitors (morning session - 56 people) -- 13%  "Yes"
CA home visitors (afternoon session - 23 people) -- 22%  "Yes"

7. Did you live with anyone who was a problem drinker or alcoholic, or who used street drugs?

ACE Study -- 26.9% "Yes"
CA home visitors (morning session - 56 people) -- 52%  "Yes"
CA home visitors (afternoon session - 23 people) -- 43%  "Yes"

8. Was a household member depressed or mentally ill, or did a household member attempt suicide?

ACE Study -- 19.4% "Yes"
CA home visitors (morning session - 56 people) -- 47%  "Yes"
CA home visitors (afternoon session - 23 people) -- 33%  "Yes"

9. Did a household member go to prison?

ACE Study -- 4.7% "Yes"
CA home visitors (morning session - 56 people) -- 17%  "Yes"
CA home visitors (afternoon session - 23 people) -- 14%  "Yes"

10. Did a parent or other adult in the household often or very often push, grab, slap, or throw something at you?

ACE Study -- 28.3% "Yes"
CA home visitors (morning session - 56 people) -- 27%  "Yes"
CA home visitors (afternoon session - 23 people) -- 27%  "Yes"

Attachments

Images (1)
  • CAHomeWS
Files (1)

Add Comment

Comments (9)

Newest · Oldest · Popular

Hi, Bob -- If you're asking at what age you need to be to be considered "head of household", even if you're the only person in that household (i.e., living alone), I expect that the U.S. Census Bureau might be able to tell you. And I also wonder if that varies by state....do all states consider the age of 18 to be the "age of majority"?

Jane,

I had a question about how, and through what age a "Household" was intended to be determined. While I was an "Emancipated Minor", my senior year in high school, and finally got my own apartment after two months of "Couch Surfing", I subsequently went to [adult] prison, after graduation...-as a "Youthful Offender"-supposedly No Criminal Record, under New York law/and federal 'Youth Corrections Act'. Is this ACE intended to apply only to "Family-Of-Origin", or might I count myself, while I was in 'my own 'Emancipated Minor' household', and is 18 or 21 considered the "Age of Majority" for household composition ? ? ?

Thank You for sharing a public response-lest anyone else have a similar concern.

Jane:

This post is fascinating and thank you for sharing the presentation. This line in one of the slides still shocks me every time:

  • Long-term, violence is not more – or less – damaging than divorce, living with an alcoholic, or being humiliated or verbally abused.

It's a really imporant point.

Also, I love the resources you share at the end.

I'm giving a talk next week and it's great to see how you've organized the material. Is it o.k. to copy (and attribute) the resource slide or others?

Cissy 

 

I've presented my ACE materials in schools and communities of southern Montana where high ACE scores, and associated outcomes, are normal. Your post is concise and clear enough to unlock our unique ACEs habitus that includes historical trauma, and chart a useful healing path. The attached powerpoint points the way. Thanks!

By creating trauma informed workplaces that focus on self care and addressing ACEs, many California counties are actively working to ensure their home visiting staff are supported.  Reflective Supervision is a key component to these programs, along with many other tools. California Project LAUNCH is working with several county health departments to consider how they can plan programmatically and systematically to address secondary trauma among their home visiting workforce, including consideration of their own ACEs - ensuring such practices are sustained and integrated throughout the organization rather than just an "add on" to home visiting programs. 
The beauty of using home visitors with lived experience is that they are able to connect with their clients, increasing engagement rates and program participation. And, as Dr. David Willis of the federal home visiting program has said, clients can "unburden themselves and begin healing." 

Jane,

In June I presented an ACE/Resilience awareness presentation to a the direct care staff at a local Commission on Aging organization. I found the same, and it is what prompted me to realize that trauma informed really cannot be implemented unless the staff and entire team are engaged in their self-care plan. Self care plans must allow for a person to process their own experiences with adversity and trauma and must include daily practice for care. Thank you for giving this topic more attention. 

Thank you for this important recognition of how ACEs affect professional care providers.  In addition to some of the strategies you mentioned, such as mindfulness, we believe that good, regular and reflective supervision for home visitors is an imperative.  Programs such as Nurse Family Partnership, Health Families America and Early Head Start already integrate Reflective Supervision into their models.  You can learn more about RS our belief that it is an essential component of a trauma informed approach to care here on the Multiplying Connections website

In the preface of the book: "Caregiver, Caretaker: From Dysfunctional to Authentic Nursing Service", a survey of all the Bachelor degreed nurses in the California Nurses Association yielded 85% who acknowledged growing up in Alcoholic Households. I believe this was published before the CDC/Kaiser- Permanente ACE study was completed, but I'm not exactly sure of the publication date of the edition from which I cited this.

Post
Copyright © 2023, PACEsConnection. All rights reserved.
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×