Skip to main content

#Me Too March: Should Michael Jackson's Music be Banned?

 

What to do with the musical legacy of Michael Jackson? People are taking sides: If you believe he was guilty, his music should be wiped from the face of the earth. If you're a diehard fan (like me!), you’re a tacit collaborator in his abuse.

What if it's not that simple? What if Michael Jackson’s musical legacy is not EITHER/OR--but BOTH/AND? In the HBO doc Leaving Neverland, both of Michael Jackson's accusers report that they loved him EVEN WHILE HE WAS ABUSING THEM. They said that the abuse felt good at the time. Rather than making them see him as a monster, the abuse solidified their feelings of being special, graced with a secret, almost magical relationship.

Leaving Neverland Director Dan Reed on PBS Newshour: “I’d like people to watch this film and be educated about how child sexual abuse and grooming really happens.”

I’m an expert on trauma. Not because I’ve studied the topic, though I have. Not because I’m finishing a training program in Gestalt Therapy, heavy on reading and practice of therapy to heal traumas. I’m an expert because I was sexually abused as a minor by two different adult men. I grew up with direct experiences of sexual abuse, and the repercussions of living with parents who knew, yet refused to acknowledge that anything had happened. I know that children respond to sexual trauma in predictable ways.

Survivors of childhood sexual abuse don’t always stop loving their abusers. My first abuser wasn’t any where near as nice to me as Wade Robson claims that Michael Jackson was to him during nights of abuse. My abuser was a visiting relative whom I adored. He gave me affection that was sorely lacking in my own family--Until the attack. It happened very fast, I vomited, I fainted, and I was never the same again. I knew my parents loved me, but I didn’t tell them when it happened, and not for decades. As a kid, I knew I couldn't survive their disbelief--and I knew they'd believe my abuser over me.

Yet in order to survive, I needed the adults around me to be "good," trustworthy. I made myself "wrong." I concluded that I was the defective one—a deep shame I still carry. I held tightly to the illusion of my first abuser as a loving, caring relative. Even decades later when I started therapy, I felt I was still in love with him in a certain sense. That early attachment couldn't be resolved except through a long healing process. Growing up, I maintained a satisfied, attached feeling to him and to my parents, something that all children need in order to survive and become adults.

I am still trying to get my head around the fact that parents can be criminally negligent and still love their children.

The accusations against Michael Jackson don't subtract anything from his musical genius. His towering legacy stands. I don’t have a problem with that. But my fandom has been complicated. I can never hear his music the same way again. Do I believe Wade Robson and James Safechuck? I will say that the relationship they describe in Leaving Neverland echoes my own experience and that of millions of other sexually abused children.

 

 

 

 

Add Comment

Comments (3)

Newest · Oldest · Popular

Hi, I agree with both of you. I have a real dislike of Woody Allen, and I won't watch his movies, but I won't argue with anyone who does. Joanie, you bring up an interesting point--in the light of #MeToo, I'm sure many of our long dead, revered male artists/musicians would not stand up to today's scrutiny. Or at least their treatment of women would be an issue.

Music is an art. He was a musical genius. My heart breaks for anyone harmed by him. But it’s the deed not the art that was the horror.

I feel strongly about preserving art in all its forms and punishing the person for the act. Even the worst people have some beauty buried beneath their ugly behavior and the paradox between good and evil lies in all of us. Most of us just don’t act on the evil.

Do we destroy the work of the Marquis de Sade? Do we burn the books written with the purpose to cause harm to others? If so, where does it end?

Having been a victim myself I can sympathize with feelings of wanting to destroy and close off any contact with anything that reminds me of the event. But if we begin to pick and choose what should or should not be read, heard or seen we will be destroying some of the rights and freedoms that only our country allows by the constitution that created our independence.

 

So true, Helen, I too cannot listen to his music without thinking about the many innocent abused little boys. It's sad but the crime was simply horrendous. 

For us survivors of sexual abuse, it just so personal.

 

Post
Copyright © 2023, PACEsConnection. All rights reserved.
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×