Skip to main content

Greetings,

I am seeking data on the cost benefits of addressing adverse childhood experiences, by implementing Trauma Informed Care in adult acute care hospitals.

Any information of cost reduction in any setting is appreciated, but I work in an acute care medical hospital. The medical physicians are showing an interest and are willing to support the momentum of trauma informed care, if I can provide what they need for administrative support. 

If I can provide statistics on the financial benefits of addressing ACE's, and being trauma informed, within the acute care medical community, it will help them create proposals or obtain approval for implementation of trainings.

Thanks so much,

Laneita

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I just finished Michael Marmot's The Health Gap and he discusses how ACEs and Education are both important in health outcomes. I highly recommend this as a starting point. It's now my bible for everything around the social determinants of health  and a great resource for talking to medical professionals. His writing is easy and the narrative unfolds to link the concepts together.

Thank you Andi.  It seems many acute care medical physicians are a challenging population, in that they are either constrained by a belief that they do not need to understand more in their setting, or that there needs to be proven financial profits. I do hope at some point a larger medical hospital will do a study on the cost benefits of practicing TIC.

Andi Fetzner posted:

I just finished Michael Marmot's The Health Gap and he discusses how ACEs and Education are both important in health outcomes. 

Actual cost-benefit studies are important.

As to why, but as  it applies to primary care, there's also the recent study of Porcerelli et al (May this year)         doi: 10.1177/0091217417730290

Again, the same old problem -- studying only the effects of childhood physical and sexual abuse rather than a broader range of ACEs -- weakens the study imho.

Of course, learning from other studies, such cost-benefit studies would need to be longitudinal in nature, and broad ranging in measuring outcomes -- as short term interventions might lead to no reduction in use of medical services (although perhaps reduced emergency services). From the abstract: "Findings revealed that adult patients with histories of childhood abuse generally scored significantly higher on measures of psychopathology, emergency room use, and doctor–patient relationship difficulty, and lower on a measure of mental and physician-rated physical health."

Also, whilst it might be more palatable, it's important to remember, which Marmot seems to not, is that his conclusion "the higher the social status of individuals, the better their health." is not clear cut -- as the original ACEs studies demonstrate, ACEs are not a respecter of social status. Irrespective of the social status of the patient " It is especially important for physicians to routinely include an assessment of childhood abuse during the psychosocial portion of the medical interview or through screening instruments."

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Last edited by Jane Stevens

Add Reply

Copyright ÂĐ 2023, PACEsConnection. All rights reserved.
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×